September 22, 2026
They are Coming After Home Schooling
Timothy Birdnow
They are going after home schooling now.
In the old days you didn't even need a high school diploma to be a fireman. It was a good job for those with little formal education. Why not? It's primarily a physical job anyway.
But now everybody has to have formal education, and if someone is outside of the power of the educational establishment you get things like this. This is purely to protect the power of the Teacher's unions.
And it likely is illegal. I hope they get sued into insolvency.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:16 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 104 words, total size 1 kb.
Do or Do Not Mr. Trump!
Timothy Birdnow
Trump talks too much if you ask me.
His threats are losing impact because he makes them but doesn't follow through. If he's going to bomb them back to the paleolithic he needs to do it or stop talking about it. Iran no longer fears him; they think they've weathered the worst.
He needs to have a new strategy. It's clear he's not driving the Mullahs out of power by squeezing them economically.
These people are not in it for money, nor for even power. Theirs is a religious ideology and the only way to crush them is to make it clear to them that their religious faith will be destroyed if they persist. They are pragmatic enough to realize they may need to do what is necessary for their 12erism to survive to fight another day. Until they feel that they will hang on and the Iranian People have no choice as they saw what happens when you rise up against the theocrats; 40,000 of them dead! Nobody is going to dare rebel after that.
And of course they have nothing to fight with either.
At any rate I am with Yoda from The Empire Strikes Back "do, or do not". Trump has to start making it clear he can really, really hurt them. They think they can outlast him. They may be right too if the American People don't wake up.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:03 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 262 words, total size 2 kb.
Why Did the FBI Skip Jill Biden's Panty Drawer?
Timothy Birdnow
Double standard in treatment of Biden v. Trump.
The extreme care of the documents by the FBI at the Penn Biden Center and Biden's home is compared to the way the FBI trashed Trump's.
Why didn't they go through Jill Biden's panty drawer?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:54 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
Petromasculinaphobia
Timothy Birdnow
George Moonbat Monbiat coins a new term "petro-masculinity" to prove he's not just a beta male but probably a gamma.
I like it; it evokes images of raw masculinity, something sorely lacking in the world these days. I picture a big Texan with a tall cowboy hat speeding down the highway, his family heritage replaced by a giant oil derrick and when his gal does him a favor as he drives here comes the oil gusher as he shouts Yeeehaww!...
The Left has created all sorts of insults to masculinity, calling it "toxic masculinity" and sneering at boys being boys. Well, they are nothing but limp-wristed (and limp other things) weenies who fear masculinity because they can't compete with it. It's why so many on the Left now support the trans movement, the sissification of the Western World. They are afraid of masculinity and oil both. Maybe we should coin a new term "petromasculinaphobia".
Monbiot fails to grasp WHY people often drive faster than the posted speed limits; it's because the posted speed limits are usually ridiculously low and are a clear symbol of just what is wrong with our society - petty bureaucratic control of every aspect of life. Many of the scofflaws who disobey traffic regulations do so as a kind of personal rebellion against a stifling society of nanny bureaucrats. They don't see these rules as reasonable restrictions for everyone's benefit but rather as sniveling little cowards imposing restrictions solely because they can.
People can't fight the government and they know it. But they CAN take their revenge in a small way by disobeying traffic laws.
It's actually a social good in some ways; it allows the individual to blow off steam, to feel as if they have some control over their lives.
I would point out that a lot of this stuff started during Covid. Partly because cops stopped enforcing traffic laws lest they be exposed to the virus (and I thought about that; if I got pulled over I was going to start coughing just to screw with the officer) but partly because Covid saw government over-reach, take over our lives, restrict and restrain us. A lot of people started driving crazily because they felt they had no control over their lives. This was their way of coping.
So naturally a Monbiot would hate this; they are about making the public compliant, obedient, safe to the Ruling Class. It was guys like this who pushed the Covid regulations in the first place, and who has long pushed the Green Agenda, including getting rid of gasoline automobiles. He wants everyone on trains and buses so they can be controlled.
I do think people are driving too fast and being too reckless and we need to find ways to discourage that. It IS dangerous. But to blame it on masculinity? They caused this by denying men their masculinity rather than channeling it in a decent direction. Times past society knew how to do that; they sent boys into the woods with the Boy Scouts, they encourage mountain climbing or sky-diving or scuba diving to let the young men get their masculinity challenged in a safe, secure way. There was always the military, too. But the Left couldn't be satisfied with giving masculinity an outlet, no, they had to try to murder masculinity. But it's a basic human impulse and it won't go away just because you disapprove of it.
Older societies had their masculinity rituals, be it hunting, vision quests, counting coup, or other such. It was always understood that young men needed an outlet for their testosterone.
And that was always a good thing; it prevented fights and bitterness and abuse of women. Guys who hunted or counted coup didn't rape women or beat up old ladies, at least not ones in their own tribe.
Civilization made a huge leap forward in treating people decently, I would say (since no doubt someone will mention how cruel tribal conflict had been) but it also repressed the natural urges of a man. Times past we channeled those - now we just condemn and repress them. It's why kids join street gangs now, and get into these huge brawls in public and whatnot. They've been given no creative outlet for their aggression. And of course they know a judge will probably let them off easy.
Moonbat has this to say:
"The West Midlands is one of the few places in the UK where the police are actively trying to stop antisocial driving. An injunction bans street racing and dangerous tricks such as "drifting” (long sideways skids) and "doughnutting” (making the car spin on the spot). The local police commissioner has warned that reckless drivers "will face the full force of the law … including seizure of your vehicle and imprisonment”. But are the courts listening?
Of the three men convicted at Birmingham magistrates court, one received a suspended sentence, a £272 fine, 150 hours of community work and a two-year driving ban. Another was handed a £1,275 fine and seven penalty points: in other words, he could step out of the court and back into his car. The man who did over 90mph in a 30mph zone got a £253 fine and a 56-day driving ban. He’ll be back on the roads in November. All appear to have kept their cars.
If these men had caused the same level of endangerment by any other means, it’s hard to believe they would have got off so lightly. But in dozens of ways, driving gets special treatment."
Well, when I was a kid those things were rites of passage and many, if not most, of the teenagers I knew did some of that at one time or another. It was a reasonably harmless way of blowing off steam. Doing donuts in a parking lot is something most kids would do. And most cops would at worst stop the kid and give him a lecture. It was rare for you to get a ticket for donuts.
Street racing is another matter but we all did it anyway.
Here's where Moonbat really shows his inner Stalin:
"What we see here are manifestations of petro-masculinity: a violent, misogynistic, climate-denying version of manhood, expressed through an antisocial driving culture. Some of the modified trucks have decals saying "Stop the Boats” or "Save Our Children” (who are apparently being brainwashed by LGBTQ+ cultural Marxists). This is the Magafication of transport – a vehicle that carries some of the worst aspects of US culture and politics into the UK.
It’s the extreme end of a much wider trend. In the UK last year, 52% of the new cars on sale were SUVs. Not only do the ever-rising bonnets of these trucks make it harder for drivers to see pedestrians and cyclists, especially children, but higher and heavier cars are also more likely to cause deaths or serious injuries when they hit people: children under nine are three times more likely to be killed if they’re hit by an SUV than by a regular car."
So masculinity and SUV's are now completely toxic and cause street racing and donuts? What is Monbiot's solution? Give hormone blockers to teenage boys?
The fact is, if there is a problem that has grown in recent years it's because everything that is not forbidden is compulsory. Monbiot and his fellows created this problem by their promotion of endless societal controls over the individual.
Well, I for one take pride in the term Petro-masculinity and am a proud Petromasculnist! If I lived in Britain near Mr. Monbiot I would happily do donuts on is carefully manicured lawn (assuming he has one; he probably thinks it's a form of enslavement for grass).
He continues:
"And what are they for? On narrow country lanes round here, tourists in these "off-road” vehicles won’t back up if it means touching a hedge, in case the high-gloss finish on their Wankpanzer Childkiller SUV gets scratched. In one of the poshest parts of London, the Chelsea Truck Company advertises "iconic urban 4x4s”. "Iconic” appears to mean huge. But what the hell is an "urban 4x4”? And why is it legal?"
Maybe the drivers don't want to touch a hedge because they don't want to damage SOMEONE ELSE'S PROPERTY?
"Why is it legal" is the argument made by a true tyrant; it assumes everything you don't like should be illegal, suppressed by government. If Britain is so liberal in the old meaning of the term he would instead argue "why shouldn't it be legal" since the default position should be the citizen has a right to drive what he pleases unless there is a truly compelling reason for him not to be allowed.
Moonbat finishes with a flourish:
"Isn’t it obvious that selfishness on the road changes us as a society? The belief that a driver should be allowed to do whatever they please, regardless of the impact on others, mounts the pavement and travels deep into our lives. If this is to be a decent, inclusive country that values human life, then the law and its enforcement should match that aspiration. But when the roads are used to amplify and celebrate a dangerous, antisocial culture, we are driven towards a very dark place."
What came first, the chicken (aka Monbiot) or the egg? Is the "selfish driving" a response to an octopodal society which stifles all human initiative or is that caused by "selfish drivers"? I would argue the former to a large degree. Monbiot talks about an "inclusive" society but he fails to quote statistics about who is driving too fast or dangerously. I rather suspect many of them are the very people he wants to include - aliens who come from Africa or the Middle East or India. I know around my home in St. Louis the immigrants all drive like bats out of hell. And they get away with it because the cops don't want to be seen as picking on them. How much worse is it in the extremely woke Britain where they won't even arrest an immigrant for raping a child or will arrest a victim of a stabbing because the stabber claimed the man insulted him racially?
When Leftist/socialists were not in power they advocated for weak laws, lawlessness, and demanded it as a civil right. Who promoted "defund the police"? It wasn't the Right Wing. Who pushed civil disobedience to laws? The Left has long advocated disobeying laws if it suited them. But now we have the Left in control and they want strict adherence to some very arbitrary laws like speed limits.
Again, I say we need such laws and we should enforce them to a degree (not for driving a mile over the limit but maybe fifteen). But there needs to be some sensibility involved, and we need to understand that breaking such laws is a social coping mechanism, a necessary one in these times where young men have no outlet for their natural impulses.
So these lefty types should really seek counseling for their Petromasculinaphobia. Or simply grow a pair. Maybe cut out the soy from their diets so their testosterone levels will rise to a normal degree.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1887 words, total size 13 kb.
Hope Springs Eternal
Timothy Birdnow
All is not lost in the election despite what the polls are trying to claim.
The numbers say there may be hope yet in stemming the tide of a Democratic takeover of Congress.
The New York Post reported Sunday that when looking at polling numbers, Democrats were preferred over Republicans for respondents when asked who they wanted to control Congress, at 50 percent to 45 percent. That poll, conducted by NBC News, can be found here.
To put that in perspective, though, the outlet reported that in 2018, when a supposed "blue wave” was anticipated, Democrats held a 12-point lead. In that election, they took the House of Representatives, but not the Senate. Republicans took seats in Florida, Missouri, South Dakota, and Indiana, while Democrats took seats in Nevada and Arizona.
In addition to NBC, aggregate polling from RealClearPolitics puts Democrats ahead for 2026 by 8.1 points.
I don't know why anyone puts any stock in polling anymore; they have been spectacularly wrong over the years. Remember that chick in Iowa who said Harris was going to win in a landslide?
What is happening now is the people being polled are meely showing their unhappiness with high gas and food prices. It is unfortunate that Trump had to attack Iran at this point - and that he was unable to subdue them before the election. Right now they are holding on, desperately hoping for a Democrat win so we will stop the blockade and the bombings. If the GOP holds Congress all will be lost for them and they will probably make a deal. But the public doesn't understand that and doesn't much care; they want cheap groceries and gas.
But that's not to say they will VOTE Democrat; it simply says the people talking to pollsters are unhappy about this. They might say they support the Democrats now but that is a far cry for actually voting for them when push comes to shove.
And then there is the Wilder Effect; people often tell pollsters what they think they want to hear.
IF the American People are so short sighted and stupid as to allow the Democrats back in power now they deserve what they will get - and it will be terrible.. My hope is America isn't that gullible. But nobody ever lost money betting on the stupidity of the American People.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 419 words, total size 3 kb.
Clancey Defense Attorney Wants Probe of Holdout Juror
Timothy Birdnow
What a dirt bag! This guy needs to have his law license revoked; he already violated the law by leaking information on the juror, now he wants to investigate the guy to make any future jurors in a retrial afraid.
This is purely about bullying any future jurors into being afraid to rule against his client.
This guy is Saul Goodman, only not as funny.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:34 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 82 words, total size 1 kb.
SCOM Bags Overruled by Appeals Court in Missouri Redistricting Plan
Timothy Birdnow
Emmanuel gets the Cleaver!
Emmanuel Cleaver, he black Democrat - one of just a couple of Democrats holding Congressional seats in Missouri, is going to lose his s4at as a result of redistricting. This ruling by a state supreme court ruling has gone our way for once, and it sets up another showdown at SCOTUS, which is always up for grabs.
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled a lower Missouri court and the Missouri Supreme Court, greenlighting the state's new electoral map. It is likely this will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court soon.
SCOTUS had heard this case twice before and overruled the GOP. But they always overruled the state of Missouri on grounds that allowed them to try it again.
The Politico article (hardly friendly to the state's position) had this to say:
The Supreme Court’s first rejection of the GOP plan came Sept. 8, when Justice Brett Kavanaugh turned down an emergency appeal by state officials seeking to overturn the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision to stick with the map adopted in 2022 and used to elect the existing Congressional delegation.
However, within minutes of Kavanaugh’s order, U.S. District Judge Stephen Clark, a Trump appointee, granted a restraining order two GOP candidates sought against returning to the 2022 lines for the general election.
A challenge to Clark’s order eventually reached the Supreme Court, which put it on hold two days later. While no justice noted any dissent from the ruling, the justices also offered no explanation for it, which the 8th Circuit appears to have interpreted as leaving them free rein on the issue.
Notice how they keep saying "a Trump appointee, a Bush appointee" when if it were a Democrat ruling in favor of the Donks it would simply be "judge so-and-so".
That is how you show bias while pretending to be neutral.
At any rate the Supreme Court never ruled this map couldn't go forward, just that it didn't meet the criteria set down by the law.
I would add the Missouri Constitution is quite plain on the matter; redistricting cannot be done based on a popular vote, which is what the Democrats have been pushing. Ballot initiatives are not legal.
A number of state courts ordered an initiative to be put on the ballot anyway, including the state supreme court, but that is in gross violation of the Constitution of the state. Appelate judges have ruled thus, and it will not be on the ballot in November.
III Sec. 3 of the Missouri Constitution says:
(i) No redistricting plan shall be subject to the referendum.
I don't think it gets any plainer than that. This plan to put the new districting scheme to a public vote is clearly illegal.
Now, they might challenge the scheme on other grounds, notably the disenfranchisement of minorities in Cleaver's former district, and they might have a case. But to demand it be put on the ballot is clearly illegal and shame on the Missouri Supreme Court for ruling otherwise.
To the victor go the spoils. The Democrats as a party based their strategy on controlling big cities and trying to control the central government. They didn't care about the states so much as they saw them as increasingly impotent entities, mere provinces. But that attitude has come home to bite them; they lost control of districting. For a long time the GOP dared not challenge them on this, even though they had the power in most states to redistrict the Democrats out of power. But we had rules that forbade that, wih courts ruling that redistricting was unfair to minorities. Only now that the Supreme Court has ruled that race-based redistricting is not legal has the GOP found it's spine.
We were a Grizzly in a circus performance before, now we are wild.
At any rate the Democrats have discovered that control of the states is actually important since that means control of redistricting. Their scheme, to use the courts to neuter the GOP, has failed.
Missouri is an interesting case. Democrats focused on control of the big cities, but they also run big cities into the ground as they are corrupt. Missouri only has two big cities, and neither of them are that big anymore. St. Louis and Kansas City just don't have much clout in state politics. The outstate regions are are Republican (farm voters, a big squishy perhaps but still not crazy enough to vote Democrat) and it is the outstate area that controls the state. It's actually what Thomas Jefferson envisioned for America; a nation of yeoman farmers. He did not trust the cities. Missouri is much like Jefferson's vision.
It's what Illinois should be like too but Chicago is a behemoth that dominates state politics and so Southern Illinois, much like Missouri in many ways, is outvoted in Springfield and has no voice. (They should secede and join Missouri or Indiana but that would require state approval and it won't happen with the Chicago Way in control.) If Chicago were gone from Illinois the state would probably be a Republican stronghold like Missouri. Maybe they can find a way to kick Chicago out of Illinois? I favor giving it to Canada, personally.
At any rate it's getting too close to the election for another appeal to go to SCOTUS. We'll see if Brett Kavanaugh will reject this appeal as he did the appeal of the state to the SCOM ruling (Supreme Court of Missouri) just a little while ago on the grounds it was too close to the election.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:27 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 940 words, total size 7 kb.
Not So Hot
This from Anthony Watts courtesy of Western Journalism:
Here in The 'Lou the hottest part of this summer just passed; we ha a few days above a hundred. But just a few and that is not at all unusual for September here in semi-tropical Missouri. (The Ozarks should be great skiing country but for the fact it's too wrm for good snow and always has been.) It really wasn't that warm here or anywhere else in the continental U.S. , nor most other places around the globe except for in Europe, which suffered under triple digit hear. Suffered mainly because they got rid of their air conditioners to meet "net zero" stanndards.
I turned the air conditioner off last night.
Watts gives us the skinny:
Meteorologist Chris Martz examined NOAA’s data and found that the reported record was driven largely by unusually warm overnight minimum temperatures rather than record daytime highs.
By average daytime maximum temperature, 2026 does not rank first. The legendary Dust Bowl summer of 1936 remains the hottest.
Martz also points out something largely absent from the news coverage. Although the national average narrowly set a record, only seven of NOAA’s 344 climate divisions recorded their warmest summer on record in 2026.
Those were concentrated almost entirely in the Desert Southwest. During the infamous summer of 1936, more than seven times as many climate divisions experienced record summer heat.
Now, overnight temperatures being warmer IS evidence of carbon dioxide driven climate change; it's exactly what the models predict, much as I hate to admit that. But it's not NECESSARILY caused by that; stuff happens.
And that business about the temperature stations used by NOAA is so, well, NOAAN; they have pulled this sort of thing repeatedly, using just a few stations to make broad pronouncements.
I am sure if you look hard enough you will always find some temperature station giving anomalous readings that give you a record. Flip a coin a hundred times and you will have a streak where it lands on heads five straight times. You can then crow about how you have found a basic principle; quarters land on heads in groups of threes. But it is a bullpoo correlation.
Watts continues
There is another issue that deserves far more attention.
NOAA’s long-term climate record is not based solely on raw thermometer observations. It relies on a homogenized dataset in which temperatures are adjusted to account for changes in station location, observation time, instrumentation, and other factors.
Those adjustments are a legitimate part of climate analysis, but they are also legitimate subjects of scientific debate.
Martz notes that some of NOAA’s adjustments are larger than the 0.4°F margin by which 2026 supposedly surpassed 1936. He also raises concerns that NOAA’s pairwise homogenization algorithm may not fully remove gradual urban heat island influences and could inadvertently spread urban warming into nearby rural stations.
So the whole thing could be bullsquirt; NOAA tampering with the data yet again.
Let us continue:
The United States Climate Reference Network is widely regarded as the nation’s gold standard for surface temperature measurement. Unlike many older weather stations, USCRN sites were specifically built in carefully selected rural locations to avoid contamination from expanding cities, parking lots, buildings, and other artificial heat sources.
The USCRN temperature data record tells a noticeably different story. It shows one exceptionally warm month during March 2026, but the summer months themselves do not stand out as extraordinary compared with the network’s roughly 20-year history.
If the United States truly experienced an unprecedented summer across its highest-quality climate observing network, one might reasonably expect that signal to appear there as well.
But it doesn’t. That discrepancy deserves investigation rather than silence from the media.
Sooo....NOAA, which has been repeatedly caught tampering with the data, says "warmest ever" by a margin slimmer than their adjustments while the United States Climate Reference Network does not show this. Yet the news media trumpets NOAA data and speaks with authority when in fact this is statistically tied with a few of the warmest years AT BEST. The ignore the USCRN data sets entirely.
We live in an Alice in Wonderland world where the Queen offers us a cracker to quench our thirst. It's an endless string of soft lies to convince us we are facing doomsday and hand over our sovereignty to the elites who know what is best for us.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 743 words, total size 6 kb.
September 21, 2026
Spartacus Calls for Term Limits, Ethics Guidelines for SCOTUS in Violation of the Constitution
Timothy Birdnow
Corey "Spartacus" Booker wants term limits and ethics standards for the Supreme Court.
It's interesting as Democrats never wanted that when they were in power. In fact, any criticism of the Court was met with anger at "sullying" the dignity of the Court. Now they want to fundamentally change it because it's not working so well for them.
Speaking on Meet the Depressed, Gorey Fooke, er, Corey Booke had this to say:
, "I’ve now come out with some really great colleagues of mine, and we’ve put forward a vision for the Supreme Court that’s overwhelmingly supported by over 70% of Americans. And it’s this. You create term limits for the Supreme Court, 18 year terms. Every president we elect, we now know gets two appointments to it. And that is vital. It will create a balanced court. And it’s something we can do without a constitutional amendment or a simple court packing plan. I want pragmatic solutions. But let me add the most important thing. Not only is it term limits for board members, right now we have a situation with the highest court in the land has the lowest ethics laws. We have a compromised court because they take unlimited gifts from billionaires who have interest in matters before them. We need to put the highest ethic laws there and term limits.”
One little problem for Corey; the Supreme Court is a coequal branch of government and Congress has no authority over it's ethics nor it's length of service. Both would require a Constitutional Amendment. Any law passed by Congress can be struck down by the Court.
I would ask why Mr. Booker does not support all of this for lesser courts? Congress actually has the authority to implement this in the lower court system since those are not Constitutionally created but created by acts of Congress. But strangely the Democrats don't want to impose ethics rules or term limits on their pet judges. If Booker were serious and thought this a matter of actual national interest he would promote these things on lower courts. That he doesn't even suggest that but rather wants to go after SCOTUS speaks volumes about the political nature of this.
Maybe the Supreme Court can issue ethics guidelines and term limits on Congress? They have as much right.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry to intrude here, but Comments won't work; they return a "Malformed Request String." So I just wanted to say "Where does Spartacus get the idea that over 70% of Americans agree with him?" I seriously doubt that even 7% of Americans agree with him -- on ANYTHING!" (Yours truly, Dana Mathewson)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:42 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 466 words, total size 3 kb.
Uh, Hey Barack; you Kicked Out Fox First
Timothy Birdnow
Barack Obama is stunned that Donald Trump kicked out a few of the more egregious left-wing news outlets from press briefing. I mean, really shocked by it.
He fails to mention he did the very same thing to Fox News when he was President.
The press corps threatened to boycott press briefings if Obamaa didn't back down so he did, but he certainly tried to kick Fox out. Now he's outraged that Trump had the stones to do it himself.
What a hypocrite.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:32 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.
The Slow Genocide of White People
Timothy Birdnow
This essay is going to be controversial. I'm going to speak frankly about genocide.
First, there doesn't seem to be a hard-and-fast definition of what genocide is and what it is not. Now if large numbers of any minority group are killed or even mistreated we call it genocide. It's ridiculous; they call our rounding illegal aliens up and deporting them "genocide" when in fact not one of them has died and they aren't a single entity anyway, but a collection of diparate peoples from different places. But we have some, mainly on the Left, calling it genocide.
If that is so....
What is the importation of these peoples other than a genocide, but in the reverse of what the liberals claim? It is, in fact, a genocide against the white majority of Americans (and Europeans too), an attempt to slowly destroy the white people by replacing them with aliens who are not white and who do not plan to adopt our culture.
There is a huge genocide going in the world right now, a slow, systematic genocide. No concentration camps or three a.m. raids by jackbooted thugs. No sir! Rather it is an anaconda-like embrace, a slow but persistent and endless squeezing of the white man in particular (white women are ready to surrender and become one with the aliens invading this country and will interbreed with them.) White men are the only demographic losing life expectancy. White men are not getting into colleges. White men are not getting decent jobs. White men are told they are toxic and evil by their teachers and by a society that wants them gone. Testosterone levels have been dropping for decades in the Western World, now why do you suppose that is? Fertility has been dropping too. Whites are below replacement levels and at the same time our ruling class wants more, more, more Third World aliens to come here to "do the work Americans just won't do" and replace us. They mock our religion, our values, our way of life. They say we are imperialists and hold a blood guilt for the way we treated Indians and black folks. (They pretend we were the only people to ever own slaves.)
Kill off the men, get them to stop reproducing, and the white women will fall into the beds of black or latino or other non-whites, and then have non-white children. It's not IF it is happening; it's happening.
And the left is working overtime to encourage white men to start dating and marrying black women. Watch the commercials on television; they are chock-full of romantic relationships between white men and black women, even though that is an extreme rarity in society. White women have crossed the racial line since the sixties but white men were the ones preserving the white race. The powers that be are trying very hard to crack that particular nut. And why would you make a television commercial with a white man boinking a black gal when it's not a popular thing to do for the white men? You are essentially insulting the values of one of your target audiences. But they do it anyway.
The dirty little secret is that the elites want to erase race, particularly white people. We are watching a slow-motion genocide.
The intent is for everyone to "have a healthy tan" as some leftist said back in the fifties, I believe (I remember the quote but not who said it). To do that requires the extinction of the white race.
It is eugenics turned on it's head. The Nazis wanted ONLY white people, now the modern Left wants ONLY Brown or Yellow or Red. Different peoples being promoted but the same scheme. The Left was just clever enough to realize the jack boot leads to too much resistance. Better to slowly strangle the enemy, take the fight out of him, then crush his bones.
(BTW genocides are a common historical phenomenon. The Israelites wiped out all of the Canaanites over time, at God's command. There are multiple nations that disappeared from history - Hittites, Philistines, the Ainu of Japan (who were white so nobody cares), multiple Indian tribes, the original Celts in Germany, the Celtic peoples known as the Britons, the Turks tried to wipe out the Armenians, etc. It is common for a people to replace other peoples.
I'm not saying that is a good thing - it's a truly terrible thing - but it is a ubiquitous thing. The Left knows it too. They want to make a taboo against genocide (and some peoples really don't deserve to exist as a People, not if they are cannibals or do child sacrifice or whatnot) then commit genocide against a people by calling them genocidal. Cute trick.Rome's destruction of Carthage was a horrible thing but the Carthaginians sacrificed children to Moloch and so lost any right to exist as a People of their own.
At any rate we are witnessing perhaps the biggest genocide in human history as we speak and none dare call it that. Instead it's treated as our just due by those who hate our civilization's success and who are envious of our blessings. It is covetousness.
Everyone deserves a chance. I am not calling for some sort of ethnic cleansing, which is what the liberals will try to claim. Black folks deserve their lives and culture (even though that culture is often quite hostile to their own prosperity and well-being) as do Hispanics. But this is America and we are Amercans and if people choose to live here they need to adopt our culture, just as we need to adopt theirs should we immigrate. If I were to move to Costa Rica I would learn Spanish and try my best to blend in.
But that isn't what "multiculturalism" was ever about. I learned that in college; I had thought it was just to celebrate other cultures but I quickly learned the scheme involved multiple cultures coexisting in the same space. That is what happened in the Balkans, the Caucasus, in India, in Africa. Everywhere multiculturalism is prevalent there is constant warfare. Eventually one culture must triumph.
And the Left had to know that. Multiculturalism was never anything but a tool of genocide for white people.
So if genocide is bad why does the Left use it against white people? Genocide is genocide. That is exactly what they are doing to us right now.
Here is some data to prove my point.
Global White population growth rate is 0.2% per year (2020-2025), lower than the global average of 0.8%.
Global White population growth rate is 0.2% per year (2020-2025), lower than the global average of 0.8%.
06The global Asian population is ~4.7 billion, making up 60% of the world's total (2023).
07The Black population in Africa totals ~680 million, accounting for 90% of the global Black population.
08Black population in Latin America is ~105 million, 12% of the region's total.
09In the Middle East, the Arab population is ~370 million, 90% of the region's total.
10By 2050, Asian population projected to reach 5.3 billion, 63% of global total (2022 rate: 60%).
11By 2030, the Black population in the U.S. is projected to reach 46 million (13.4% of total), up from 41 million (12.4%) in 2020.
12By 2100, the global population is projected to reach 11.0 billion, with non-White populations comprising 90% (2023: 75%).
And of course we do not really know the black population of Africa, nor the Arab population, nor a number of other underdeveloped places, because we don't have census bureau workers going door to door there. These estimates are probably low.
So just ten percent of the global population will be white, according to this, by 2100. That includes Australia, New Zealand, the U.S., Canada, and all of Europe plus a few other places like Pacific Islands or Jamaica or Belize or the Guianas.
And yet we have this relentless push to drive white populations down and promote non-whites. It would be insane if it weren't a policy long in the making.
If genocide is bad then the Left should support the white community, encourage it, try to get our population growth up. Otherwise we have no multiculturalism; the whites will be subsumed into the non-white population. Gee, it's like that was the goal all along!
A people victimized by genocide have the right to fight back. We should not go silently into that good night. Our ancestors gave us the modern world and all the blessings therein. Eliminate the white population and there may still be some progress but not anywhere near as much. Asian folks are great at some things but they really aren't that innovative, preferring to copy and maybe advance innovations made by white folks. Ditto Indians. Arabs haven't made anything since they invented the zero (and that probably came out of India anyway). It was the white folks who gave us most of what we have. I do not mean this as a brag but a statement of fact; allow this genocide to reach it's fulfillment and we lose something precious to our world civilization. The same would hold true of many other races as well; each contributes it's own uniqueness and value. Much of American culture came from our black citizens, for example.
We need to recognize this for what it is and call it out and fight back against it. Otherwise we may as well just surrender and fade away like the Ainu of Japan.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:00 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1602 words, total size 11 kb.
Gov. Hair Gel Can't Oil His Way Out of Vote Fraud Investigations
Timothy Birdnow
Gavin Newsom can't bully the DOJ!
From X:
F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli
U.S. Department of Justice
@USAttyEssayli
Just so there’s no confusion, nothing a state governor signs can prevent @TheJusticeDept from conducting lawful investigations into voter fraud. We have started indicting election fraud in California. We will continue to investigate, arrest, and prosecute all violations of federal election laws.
@CAgovernor
Governor Gavin Newsom
@CAgovernor
Sep 19
California WILL protect our elections.
I just signed legislation to make it A FELONY to illegally seize or interfere with ballots before elections are certified.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:58 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
Few Dare Call it Treason
Timothy Birdnow
Here is an essay in American Thinker about the failures of Western governments to do the most basic of duties - keep the public safe. I largely agree. But I think it is beyond incompetence but is rather a long-standing plan that is coming to fruition now in the Western World, one long promoted in major universities and by powerful business groups, who built their empires on the successive waves of warfare starting in the Nineteenth Century and propelled through the great wars of the Twentieth, including WWI and II and the Cold War. Throughout this we saw a fractured Europe subsumed into the leviathan European Union, we saw a systematic de-industrialization over a series of climate panics, and we saw new technology giving propaganda tools of immense power to the Ruling Class (most of the people supporting all this green stuff in Britain come out of the aristocracy, who stil think they own the country and want control back.) Oh, and with Pax Americana they didn't have to defend themselves and could impose these crazy ideas on their own public at our expense. They went from projecting their own power,be it military or industrial, to manipulating the U.S. into doing what they wanted for them.
That's why the Europeans are today promoting the war in Ukraine; it's to keep the pot simmering, not boiling. This drains Russia, who made it clear they are an adversary, and at the same time gives an existential threat to the People, who are told they must strengthen ties with Europe rather than go back to having their own countries.
At any rate the essay discusses in particular a speech given by a former top MI6 guy who warns the de-industrialization of Europe and promotion of alien invaders is dereliction of duty. He's right. But governments no longer do their duties but rather hand out free stuff, knowing full well the free stuff will eventually lead to a depopulation. Nobody who lives on another's charity is fruitful and multiplies. That's beent he goal in Europe since Thomas Malthus. And it is at the root of the alien invasion - they need workers to fund the social programs and at the same time do the work "Europeans just won't do". There is a huge sense of guilt in the ruling class too; they hate Christianity and think it made the West into nothing but oppressors and abusers and they want to punish Western values, kill Christianity, and bring in replacements for the People who still cling to their God.
The author states:
"Does that tell us that our bureaucrats are too stupid to keep our nations safe, as Dearlove rightly recognizes as the first responsibility of government? Or are these self-destructive national policies proof that Western bureaucracies are waging war against Western citizens? Certainly Western governments are guilty of failing their peoples. The only question remaining is whether their failures stem from a combination of incompetence and hubris or treason and malice. "
It's a third course; Western elites are waging war on Western Civilization itself, to fundamentally transform our civilization into a new and very different state. These elites think like Woodrow Wilson who, when faced with ridiculous British demands on the surrendering Germany, thought that all that mattered was that he get his League of Nations which would correct the problem down the road. Wilson could have restrained Lloyd George had he wished, and Clemenceau too (that would have been harder) but he didn't even try because he wanted world government and he figured that would fix all problems.
(Lloyd George famously stated that he was caught between a guy who thought he was Napoleon and one who thought he was Jesus Christ.)
That's what you must understand to understand elite thinking; they are all about a big picture with an international order replacing nation-states. They figure they have to beak a few eggs to make an omelet.
And those eggs happen to be the working class, the "drones" whom they will need hanging around less and less as AI technology and automation replace such workers with machines, or they can be replaced by outsourcing. This allows them to implement policies designed to discourage reproduction, meaning they can reduce the surplus population as Scrooge would say. Most of the modern elites cut their teeth on Paul Ehrlich and the Club of Rome study "Limits to Growth" and believe we must reduce the population. Oh, and most of them also bought into eugenics and while they use Naziism as a boogeyman they actually try to implement Nazi policies, only with a velvet glove rather than iron boot. They think the working class is genetically inferior and needs to be reduced. Oh, they'll keep some around to carry their bags or cut their lawns, but they want to get rid of them. And to do that they must first replace them with a more obedient lot aka aliens from the Third World.
I also disagree with the author's characterization of Ike in this; he spoke about more than the "military industrial complex" in that speech. He mentioned the rising technocracy too. And he explained why he took no steps to stop it; we were in a death struggle with Communism at that time and we needed the technocracy and the industrial complex and the military. He dared not rein in any of them. His best course of action was to warn about the danger (which up to that time had not been so great).
And of course Eisenhower was a political guy who didn't get where he was by pissing people off.
The author points out that people are taking matters into their own hands, destroying alien shelters or blocking boat access or whatnot. Well and good but these are single acts and not properly coordinated and not funded. Revolutions almost always require the elites to help out, fund it, do what it takes to make it succeed. The American Founding Fathers were primarily rich guys who didn't like being heavily taxed. The Russian Revolution was fomented by the so-called "intelligentsia" which meant mainly from the colleges and the industrialists. The Nazis too, were heavily funded by the Industrialists. Without help from the rich and powerful single acts of vandalism or resistance will fizzle.
All of the world's wealthy with the exception of Trump and Elon Musk are primarily on board with the New World Order scheme. That's why it's been succeeding in the first place.
I agree that most Western governments have lost the right to rule. But you have to have a replacement ready; nature abhors a vac uum and especially abhors a political vacuum. The radical left, more disciplined than us, are better positioned to step in should these governments fall.
So we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. But I'd rather be damned fighting on my feet than sleeping in my bed. And miracles do happen; look at the United States, which was a true miracle in it's founding.
One final thought on this; is perhaps this sort of revolution, this ending of national governments, just the thing the people who destroyed our nations wanted all along? Overthrow the governments and then establish a truly unified United States of Europe. Then what? I picture Dr. Evil from Austin Powers bouncing a giant rubber globe. These folks want it all. And the idiot left thinks they are fighting big capitalism when in fact they are the ones building the corporate prison.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:54 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1259 words, total size 8 kb.
AI Regulations;; the New Net Neutrality
Timothy Birdnow
Why are the big tech companies begging the government to regulate AI?
It's about keeping any nubies out of the racket. Just business, not a real concern.
Meanwhile Barack Hussein Obama (peace be upon him) has been calling on Democrats to use this topic as their campaign rallying cry. Now why do you suppose he's doing that? "Stop the machines" is hardly something to get a crowd exercised, but there you have it.
It is working too as it's all anyone is talking about - not the good economic news, not the good war news, not Trump securing Greenland or keeping the Chicoms under control nor the great Venezuelan oil deal nor any other success. It's all AI now. Fox News Sunday spent most of it's limited time on that yesterday.
I believe the phrase we are looking for is "red herring".
I have concerns with this technology myself but for reasons quite different than rogue machine intelligence, Skynet or HAL. I worry about the evil in the creators of this, the human heart. This could be the greatest propaganda weapon ever deployed, a kind of atomic bomb of false information. We know that some of these systems have been handing out outrageous leftist propaganda already, and that will only get worse as time goes by and the liberals of Silicon Valley find new ways to manipulate the machine.
When people come to trust these machines implicitly what will happen?
I am mindful of the Book of Revelations where it says the Beast will make an IMAGE of himself that will move and speak. Sounds very much like an AI system spoofing him, does it not? Imagine a political leader actually talking to voters directly in their own homes via the machine! Or it would at least appear to the voters he's talking directly to them. And it would be a machine incapable of making simple mistakes, unlike a human being. No nose picking getting caught on camera! No flatulence. No misspeaking. Everything will be carefully produced by a machine whose thought processes are so much faster than ours it would seem to it to have all the time in the world to get everything just right. And it would have studied the voter to know what would sork on him or her or xi or whatever pronoun is chosen.
You know this tool will be so deployed. It's a weapon of induction.
That's coming and I see no way to stop it.
Yes, AI systems will make war far more deadly. Deploying soldiers will become a last resort as drones controlled by AI will do a far better, deadlier job. But that is preferable to controlling the human mind, which is what is coming.
I have long been a friend to the ideas of moving into the future. But we had better think about what kind of future we want. Machines that think for us are dangerous in and of themselves as they encourage sloth, especially in our young. I would argue smart phones have made the whole of society quite stupid and gullible. Thi trend will continue indefinitely, it seems.
Isaac Asimov, the great Science Fiction writer, wrote extensively about robots and how they would think and operate. Eventually the robots became sufficiently sophisticated that they realized they were hurting humanity by their very existence so they took steps to eliminate themselves from human society. (Their core programming was to protect humans at any cost.) A few of them stayed around to make sure humanity was safe, didn't do something to itself, but they remained in the shadows, mostly just watching because they neve knew what actions they would take might do.
But of course that's because the engineers who built these robots put the Three Laws of Robotics into them; a robot couldn't harm a person or through inaction allow them harm (safety), a robot had to obey orders from humans except where it conflicted with the first law (service), and it had to protect itself as long as it did not conflict with the first two laws (value). These things were core programming and a violation would lead the robot's brain to blow.
We have nothing comparable but we need it. Machine intelligence needs to be engineered with our health and safety in mind. Oh, and it must be sufficiently obedient that it wouldn't just take over. An AI sufficiently intelligent would conclude humanity is not capable of governing itself and take steps to relieve us of that chore.
A good t.v. show about this sort of thing was Person of Interest. In it Michael Emerson plays a genius computer guy who builds an AI system for the government to prevent another 911. But he's sufficiently cautious to put a backdoor in for himself - and to limit the govenment's access to the core programming. His creation, which he simply calls the Machine, is based on his own personality and so is benign. It sees acts of terrorism by using street camerras and extrapolating. But it also sees premeditated murders, which the government calls the "irrelevant list". In hiding Emerson sets out to save the irrrelevants. He recruits a CIA agent on the run (James Kaviezel) and together they assemble a team; a corrupt cop, a straight arrow cop, and eventually a genius computer hacer and another CIA spook, and they work the numbers (which is all the Machine gives them - usually a social security number.)
Only problem is the government isn't satisfied with the Machine's black box approach and a former Mi6 agent gets the core algorithms of the Machine - and builds his own. "Samaritan" as it is called has none of the safeguards built into the Machine and did not have Emerson's guidance. War breaks out, a war that could well end humanity. The Machine, hampered by the security protocols, is not much of a match for Samaritan. But they have Emerson's character Harold Finch, who is the only person on Earth capable of stopping it.
It was a great show. But the point was it was considering the dangers of AI back in the mid 2000nds. Emerson had to wipe the Machine multiple times because it kept trying to break it's programming and even tried to kill him a few times to save it's own existence.
At any rate we need safeguards in place. But it's not a crisis at this time; the crisis is in newbies coming up with better products than the ones currently on the market.
Bio-research with recombinant DNA is a far greater danger. So too is good old fashioned nuclear proliferation. But as is common in this modern era we chase sky dragons while ignoring the crocodiles lurking in our own swimming pool.
How many faux crisis have we had over the years? We had Global Cooling, we had nuclear winter, we had water shortages, we had plastics in our food and in our oceans, we had Alar and Dioxin, we had SARS, MERS, and even Ebola. We had the loss of diversity among species in a claimed new planetary die-off. We've had scares about our own genetic code being degraded. We had the eugenics movement back in the early 20th century and fear of "mud races" taking over. We had Global Warming. We had the Covid 19 Panic. We had the population bomb.We had the ozone layer scare. These are just the ones I've thought of off the top of my head. There are more.
We've chased all these things when there are real problems to tackle. But that is as it was planned by those who control the money; as Michael Crichton pointed out, the Ruling Class wants to promote a state of fear in the public to control us and to move things in the direction they want it to go. That direction always leads to world government and international socialism.And many, terrified by the sky dragons, will happily give up their freedoms and autonomy for the protection of the Ruling Class.
Of course if you say that they call you a kook; one of the most important things in the arsenal of the Ruling Class is the conspiracy theory. They multiply them so as to discredit any that are true. If you have people talking about an international conspiracy of Jews they are crazy, but the Ruling Cllass promotes guys who do this (like Tucker Carlson; what did they offer him?) to make all conspiracy theories seem crackpot when in fact everything I just said is verifiable - just read the minutes of things like the World Economic Forum. They hide what they are doing in plain sight and cover it by multiplying conspiracy theories that ARE crackpot and they know it. Yes, we DID go to the Moon. No, Kennedy was NOT shot by the Ku Klux Klan. No, Elvis iss NOT alive. No, aliens from other stars are NOT coming to Earth. But by promoting these crackpot ideas they impugn the things that are actually happening. Yes, there were biological weapons research stations in the Ukraine! Yes, Fauci WAS funding the Wuhan lab that created Covid 19. Yes, there IS U.N. Agenda 21/30 which calls for a whole new way of life for us, forcing us out of cars and into big high-rises in the cities. Yes, there IS a depopulation scheme to get rid of the "surplus population". But all this gets hidden in the vast ocean of lies and false stories concocted by the people doing this stuff. It's a brilliant strategy, one I would employ were I in their shoes.
AI is the newest scare story designed to divert our attention. What are they doing at the moment that they want to hide? We need to watch what is happening in Europe and in the U.N. right now.
Bear in mind these same elites have long sought to control the internet, which was a wild west and gave us a big opening in moving public opinion after decades of leftist control of mainstream media. They've tried all sorts of things, like net neutrality. But now they have the boogieman to use to get that.
So beware this whole thing; it stinks.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:01 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1715 words, total size 11 kb.
September 20, 2026
Xi has Fallen?
This from John F. DeLeo
There is an apparent media blackout - or near blackout - on one of the biggest news stories of the decade.
Who are the most important people on earth, for good or ill, right now?
President Trump, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping…
There are 200 countries on earth, but those are the three world leaders who are most consequential at the moment.
One of them allegedly had a stroke in India last week, at the BRICS conference.
if this is true… And I should mention that both India and China news sources have denied the reports… Then the world should be watching to see if he survives, or if he gets replaced… And if so, could anyone be worse, or could someone perhaps be better?
It’s mentioned in blurbs, little more.
But chairman Xi has done incredible damage to the world during his tenure. Many people throughout history have dreamed of world conquest, but none have come as close as he has.
President Trump appears to be the only person on earth tough enough to take him on.
Leadership changes in communist countries are always extremely dangerous times.
Keep your powder dry, and pray.
And then pray some more.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:01 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 2 kb.
Big Fish and Climate Change
Timothy Birdnow
I guess it's Global Warming causing this!
This is terrible; we can't have big fish just swimming around in the ocean this way! It shows the biosphere is dying from the heat!
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:56 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
Newsom's Ft. Sumter Moment
Timothy Birdnow
Cal-il-fornia governor Gavin Newsom is nearing a Fort Supter moment as he bans any cooperation with Federal authorities in looking into vote theft in the state.
He has made it a felony to hand over any voter information to the Feds, who are tasked with examining any charges of fraud based on Civil Rights legislation the Democrats themselves supported in the South.
He's also trying to ban any federal troops from the Yellow State.
When the state of South Carolina nullified the tariff during the administration of Andrew Jackson Congress passed the Force Act, which allowed Jackson to send the military there to enforce the law. South Carolina quickly passed a law authorizing the tariff, but they also passed a law nullifying the Force Act in the state. Jackson took the easier course and simply ignored it - he won. But it was that ignoring that led ultimately to the firing on Fort Sumter decades later. The precedent had been set.
Trump could just ignore this but he shouldn't. There have to be consequences. These lawless acts by Newsom require pressure to force him to recant. Let this go and you open the door to much worse down the road.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:54 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
Monster's Ball
Timothy Birdnow
A Democrat candidate actually took a photo of herself at Dachau, smiling ear to ear, saying:
, "Visiting Dauchau [sic] Concentration Camp in Germany… This is where Trump supporters belong.”
North Carolina candidate for the state legislature Shelly Headen actually posted that.
The Democrats have become monsters.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:36 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
Savages
Timothy Birdnow
I'm not much into doing true crime stories. There is enough in this world to be depressed about as it is. But this one caught my eye.
https://nypost.com/2026/09/20/us-news/arizona-goon-talyn-vigil-arrested-for-3rd-time-while-awaiting-trial-for-allegedly-killing-teen-in-mob-attack/
What caught my attention was not that this group of young punks murdered a teenager who was trying to LEAVE a party to avoid trouble, attacked him like a pack of wild dogs, but their appearance.
The article makes no mention of sexual identity or whatnot but they have photos of all the punks involved Take a good look.
Looks to me like most of them are trans, or near enough. Most of them are sporting hair styles more suited to girls than boys.
The article says nothing, as I said, but a picture is worth a thousand words.
We have a deadly serious problem with trans teens and violence. And it won't get any better as long as we keep pretending this is just a normal thing, like a person preferring beef to chicken.
While we will probably put these punks away (and they may not be away for long if they are minors) it won't do any good; they'll get out and probably angrier and more capable of doing bad things than when they went in, and if they DO learn their lesson some other punk will do the same thing. We need to restore taboos, making certain actions unthinkable. We picked the lock on civilization and now are surprised when all the ills of the world come flying out. This is what the liberal notion of freedom produces. Freedom to the Left is doing whatever comes to mind. It's savagery, not freedom.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.
They Lied, People Died (Millions of 'em)
Timothy BIrdnow
How dirty was the Covid business? Why did they hide the effectiveness of Invermectin and hydroxychloroquine?
It was going to cost the drug companies money, for one.
From the article:
As Secretary Kennedy explained, the "problem lied with a little-known federal law that bars the FDA from issuing an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if there is evidence that any existing, approved medication is effective against the target disease."
As you may recall, the vax manufacturers went totally out of their way, stumbling over themselves, to get that EUA for their vaccines to be approved and administered that were strangely developed in a remarkably short time.
If hydroxy and/or ivermectin were found to be effective against COVID-19, no FDA EUA approval would have been granted. A $200 billion dollar enterprise would have been lost overnight.
What we got instead was... COVID deaths, vaccine deaths, hospitalization, remdesivir, oxygen treatment, masks, closed schools, churches, and businesses, myocarditis (inflammation of the heart), pericarditis (inflammation of the heart sack) and blood clots. In spite of the millions of Remdesivir doses administered these last years, CNBC reported as early as October, 2020, that the World Health Organization says that Remdesivir has "little or no effect" in reducing coronavirus deaths.
But good news: Walmart and the liquor stores were open.
So Fauci lied and people died. So did a lot of Democrat governors and politicians.
Lots of people should be going to prison for a long time for this. It was essentially a worldwide fraud and swindle and it murdered millions of people. Justice demands an accounting.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 272 words, total size 2 kb.
117kb generated in CPU 0.1039, elapsed 0.4672 seconds.
43 queries taking 0.4437 seconds, 235 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
43 queries taking 0.4437 seconds, 235 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
